Security Test Generator

Pick a framework, tick the OWASP-style categories you need, paste your base URL, and get a starter test file with auth checks, injection payloads, header assertions, and session cases ready for your endpoints.

Configuration

Framework, app shape, target URL, test categories.

Security categories

Generated output

Select categories, then generate. Output lands here.

Green CI on Friday. Production breach on Monday. The gap is almost always missing negative cases: unauthenticated calls, malformed tokens, injection strings in query params, headers absent on the root response.

A security test generator does not close the gap alone. You still wire real routes, swap placeholder paths, run the suite against a staging host. What you get here is a structured scaffold so your team does not start from a blank describe() block every sprint.

Not a pentest

Generated files use generic paths like /login and /protected-endpoint. They assert status codes against those placeholders. No spider, no authenticated crawl, no business-logic abuse. Treat output as a checklist skeleton, not an OWASP ASVS sign-off or a substitute for a professional penetration test.

Six categories, what each block tries to prove

Checkboxes map to describe blocks or Postman folders. Uncheck a row when your stack already covers the area elsewhere.

Authentication & Authorization
401 without credentials, 401 with garbage tokens, 403 when a low-privilege token hits an admin route, weak password rejection on register.
Injection
SQL strings in login bodies, XSS in comment fields, shell metacharacters in execute-style endpoints. Payloads are textbook samples, not a full fuzz list.
Data validation
10k-character names, invalid email shapes, executable filenames on upload fields.
Session management
Token invalidation after logout, expired session rejection. Timeout tests need your clock or mock setup.
Cryptographic checks
Password fields absent from JSON responses, HTTPS base URL expectation, token length uniqueness in a small batch.
HTTP headers
Presence of X-Frame-Options, nosniff, HSTS, CSP on the root GET. Server version strings hidden where possible.

Five export shapes

FrameworkFile you getRuns whereGap to fill
Laraveltests/Feature/SecurityTest.phpphp artisan test against your appSet APP_URL to your target host, replace route paths, wire Sanctum or Passport tokens in auth tests
Jestsecurity-tests.test.jsNode CI with axios installedReplace paths, add auth helper in beforeAll
Pytestsecurity-tests.test.pyPython pipeline with requestsMap class methods to your route table
PostmanCollection JSONNewman or desktop runnerAuth folder only ships two requests today. Session and crypto folders are Laravel/Jest/Pytest only.
OWASP ZAPNode driver scriptMachine with ZAP proxy on 8080Install ZAP, configure target scope, never point at prod without approval

Application type (web, API, SPA, mobile backend) labels the suite in comments. Output structure stays the same. Rename endpoints yourself.

Why placeholder routes break naive CI jobs

Out of the box, Jest posts to /login with ' OR '1'='1. Your API might use /auth/token with OAuth fields. The test fails with 404, not 400. Developers mark the job flaky and disable the folder.

Fix order: copy the file, global-replace the base URL if needed, then replace each path segment. Run one describe block against staging before you merge the whole tree. One green auth test beats six red injection tests you never read.

Where this sits beside other generators

The API Test Generator builds happy-path REST coverage with status and schema checks. Start there when endpoints lack basic automation.

Layer this page when you need negative security cases on the same routes. The Integration Test Generator covers multi-service flows. Security blocks fit inside those suites after you paste auth helpers from here.

Static source review belongs on the Code Security Scanner or Code Vulnerability Scanner pages. Runtime header checks from this tool complement static findings, not replace them.

Manual probe before codegen? Send one request through the API Endpoint Tester, confirm the path responds, then paste the URL into the target field above.

Download names and copy behavior

Copy puts the editor buffer on the clipboard. Download names the file by framework: SecurityTest.php for Laravel, .test.js, .test.py, .json, or .js for ZAP driver code. No zip, no env file, no GitHub Action YAML.

For full browser regression with login flows, open the End-to-End Test Generator. For unit-level mocks without HTTP, the Unit Test Generator stays closer to function scope.

Reviewed August 2026. Generation runs in your browser. Target URLs are not sent to Toolexe servers.

Questions about generated security tests

Answers tied to what this generator outputs, not generic AppSec theory.

Do generated tests hit my live API automatically?

No. Nothing runs until you save the file, install dependencies if needed, and run php artisan test, Jest, Pytest, Newman, or ZAP yourself. The page only writes text into the editor.

Why do injection tests target /comment and /execute?

Those paths are OWASP-style placeholders. Replace them with your real write endpoints. Payload strings are common samples, not a complete attack dictionary.

Does application type change the generated code?

The selector records intent in suite titles and comments. Checkbox blocks and endpoint names stay identical across web, API, SPA, and mobile backend choices.

Why is my Postman export shorter than Jest?

Postman output currently includes auth, injection, and header folders only. Session, crypto, and data validation blocks appear in Laravel, Jest, and Pytest exports when those boxes stay checked.

Is the OWASP ZAP script ready for headless CI?

The script assumes ZAP listens on localhost:8080, runs spider plus active scan, and waits for completion loops. You need ZAP installed, scoped targets, and legal approval before automating against any host.

Will a passing suite mean we are secure?

No. Status-code checks on placeholder routes miss IDOR, race conditions, SSRF, and auth logic bugs. Use this output as a starting regression layer, then add review, DAST, and manual testing for release gates.