Decision Maker

Which path survives once you stop rehearsing the same argument? Name the fork, list at least two routes, pick a lens, and let the structure argue back.

1 Frame
2 Paths
3 Lens

Compose

Lens
Paths to compare
Recent snapshots

Output

No lens active yetPick a method, name the fork, add paths, then run analysis.

The honest fork: when feelings already picked a winner

Most stalled decisions are not missing data. They are missing a shared surface where every option faces the same questions.

This page gives you four surfaces. Pros and cons force parallel lists before you declare a favorite. The weighted grid turns gut scores into arithmetic you adjust when a boss suddenly cares about cost more than speed. Eisenhower quadrants separate “loud” from “strategic” when every item feels on fire. SWOT stretches one path across strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats so you see external pressure instead of only internal pride.

None of these replace legal advice, medical guidance, or a finance sign-off. They expose assumptions so you walk into those rooms with cleaner notes.

How each lens reshuffles the same paths

Pros / cons
Best when two or three paths differ on emotional trade-offs. Add bullet lines, tally non-empty rows, then read which side you avoided writing down.
Weighted grid
Best when criteria disagree across the team. Percent weights should sum to one hundred before you trust the totals; the script multiplies each score by its weight.
Eisenhower
Best when urgency noise hides importance. Drag chips into quadrants on a desktop browser; touch users assign mentally, then type notes elsewhere if drag fails.
SWOT
Best when one strategic bet needs narrative. You get four text areas per path, ideal before a stakeholder memo.

Stop expecting the tool to choose for you

Arithmetic only sees numbers you typed. If every column gets a seven because politeness wins, the matrix lies politely too.

Drafts and analyzed runs both land in history; delete rows you no longer want. Export hands you plain text for email archives. For habit-level follow-through after you commit, pair the outcome with Habit Tracker so the decision shows up as a daily cue instead of a forgotten tab.

Reality check: Mobile Safari may clear local storage when space runs low or when you manually wipe site data. Treat history as a scratchpad, not a compliance log.

Which surface matches the argument you are actually having

LensSignals you care aboutFails when
Pros / consEmotional cost, reversible trade-offsEvery pro sounds equally strong on paper
Weighted gridCompeting KPIs with different ownersWeights mirror politics, not strategy
EisenhowerCalendar pressure versus strategic valueEverything lands in “urgent” because culture rewards noise
SWOTExternal forces and narrative memosTeams treat threats as gossip, not data
Use the row that embarrasses your team least; the point is shared language, not perfect science.

Three scenes where structure beats another group chat

When the bottleneck is calendar placement instead of values, open Time Blocking Tool next so the chosen path owns visible hours.

Where this sits beside other Toolexe planners

Task Priority Calculator ranks an existing backlog. This maker appears earlier: you still owe the list of paths. Goal Setting Calculator stretches targets across months once you know which branch you defend.

Polling a group? Poll Generator collects votes; bring the top two options here when comments contradict the tally.

Long paragraph for readers who want the processing story spelled slowly: you type a title so future you recognizes the session. Context captures constraints the title should not carry alone. Paths are symmetrical inputs; the lens decides which geometry appears in the output card. Run analysis rebuilds the card and logs an analyzed snapshot. Save draft logs the same metadata without rerendering the card, useful when you are mid-meeting and need a breadcrumb. Reset clears fields and returns the empty state. Export serializes whatever sits in the output region plus your form values so you paste into Notion, Slack, or a ticket without granting Toolexe any copy.

Privacy in one sentence

Everything executes in your browser tab; Toolexe never receives the titles, paths, or scores you enter.

About this page

Toolexe builds small utilities for everyday work. This layout was tuned for thumb reach first, then widened into a two-column studio on large screens.

Reviewed March 2026 for accuracy of the four lenses and browser storage behavior.

Questions people ask before trusting a browser-only decision sheet

Storage, export, and honest limits.

Does Toolexe store my decision text on a server?

No. Titles, context, paths, and generated layouts stay inside your browser. History uses localStorage only. Export builds a text file locally through a download link.

Why do weighted totals look wrong until I press Apply weights?

Totals start at zero until the script multiplies each score by the percentage you assigned per criterion. Adjust weights or scores, then run the button again.

What is the difference between Save draft and Run analysis?

Save draft records the current title, context, method, and paths in history without rebuilding the output card. Run analysis renders the lens UI and also logs an analyzed snapshot.

Can I drag chips on a phone?

HTML drag and drop behaves inconsistently on small touch screens. Eisenhower mode works best on desktop browsers. If dragging fails, describe placements in the context field instead.

How many snapshots are kept?

The history list trims to ten newest entries. Remove older ones with the Remove control beside each row.